Related Videos from Youtube

• 
  The Ethical Case Against Intellectu...
  Oct 22, 2009 www.youtube.com en.wikipedia.org
• 
  Stephan Kinsella on Intellectual Pr...
  Podcast Version: www.fdrurl.com Stephan Kinsella is an American intellectual property lawyer and libertarian legal theorist. His electronically-published works are primarily published on his blog and websites associated with the Ludwig von Mises Institute and anarcho-capitalist organizations. This is a Freedomain Radio book club discussion of one of Stephan's most popular books: "Against Intellectual Property" (linked below). www.mises.org Freedomain Radio is the largest and most popular philosophy show on the Web -- www.freedomainradio.com
• 
  Mike Turner Removes Intellectual Pr...
  Full video here: www.vimeo.com
• 
  Joseph Stiglitz: The Economic Found...
  Joseph Stiglitz: The Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property

• 
  Councils Courts and Conmen Part 2 o...
  Councils, Courts and Conmen was recently sent to us anonymously. The film documents a "liability hearing" for council tax where lay advisers entered the court under common law and were kept waiting for two and a half hours and put into a criminal court with a dock rather than the small rooms usually used in courts for this purpose. The film shows how magistrates and the clerk will do anything rather than honour their oath, even calling the police who do act honourably. The freemen win the day however, but of course the "liability" was already established. However the court employees still got paid...Thats Justice???!!!
• 
  Councils, Courts and Conmen Part 1...
  Councils, Courts and Conmen was recently sent to us anonymously. The film documents a "liability hearing" for council tax where lay advisers entered the court under common law and were kept waiting for two and a half hours and put into a criminal court with a dock rather than the small rooms usually used in courts for this purpose. The film shows how magistrates and the clerk will do anything rather than honour their oath, even calling the police who do act honourably. The freemen win the day however, but of course the "liability" was already established. However the court employees still got paid...Thats Justice???!!! Watch out for more info on how councils print the court summons and do not issue lawful liability orders, as of course nobody sees an original order with their name on signed and sealed by the court! This means of course that a bailiff cannot be appointed by the court as they would have to have a liability order from the court in the name of the PERSON, so they just get in debt collectors who refer to themselves as bailiffs. Ask for a true copy of the liability order and things could go a bit quiet! This certainly seems to be the case in many areas. Let us know about YOUR experiences! The court is just a facade..This is because they hire a room in the court to make it look like a court. When a number of lay advisers turned up it really had to look like a court!!!!!
• 
  Zombies take over the courts! (more...
  So many targets, so little time. There were about a dozen other topics I could have tackled this weeks so some of them are still bubbling away in my head and may come out as other videos. Also, I know this is long-ish but after putting it together I didn't want to lose any of the content. Links of interest: Brazil's Catholic Church is suing Hollywood www.abc.net.au Stupid court ruling against Google in Italy: articles.latimes.com Zombies vs Cops in Minnesota court: www.abc.net.au And some scary insight into how pervasive surveillance is in the US: www.wired.com My shirts on RedBubble www.redbubble.com There arereally cheap shirts here that are still pretty good quality (and you can customise them!) www.zazzle.com And here are the CafePress shops: www.cafepress.com.au This is my BlogTV channel: www.blogtv.com Stalk me on Twitter! twitter.com Read my blog! angryaussie.wordpress.com Send me hate mail! GPO Box 3290 Melbourne 3001 Australia Call the angry phone 0424 05 69 65 in Australia +61 424 05 69 65 outside Australia
• 
  BREAKING: Supreme Court Gives US Go...
  WASHINGTON - In a landmark ruling, the US Supreme Court on Thursday struck down laws that banned corporations from using their own money to support or oppose candidates for public office. By 5-4 vote, the court overturned federal laws, in effect for decades, that prevented corporations from using their profits to buy political campaign ads. The decision, which almost certainly will also allow labor unions to participate more freely in campaigns, threatens similar limits imposed by 24 states. It leaves in place a ban prohibiting corporations and unions from directly contributing funds to candidates for any use. In a statement, President Barack Obama said that the decision gives 'a green light to a new stampede of special interest money in our politics.' The president pledged to work with Congress to 'develop a forceful response' to the court's ruling. Critics of the stricter limits have argued that they amount to an unconstitutional restraint of free speech, and the court majority agreed. "The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more conservative colleagues. Strongly disagreeing, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent, "The court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the nation." Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Stevens' dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the courtroom. The justices also struck <b>...</b>